 |
 |
wYour hosts |
 |
 |
 |
blaster
thecouch -at- overpressure.com
yes, an homage to jonah
pittspilot
pittspilot -at- overpressure.com
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
w
|
 |
 |
 |

They have editors, don't they?
Powerline Blog has a post about the latest stuff on the Bush AWOL story. They point to the CBS News site about it, and a reader notes:
Every single one of the memos to file regarding Bush's failure to attend a physical and meet other requirements is in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman. In 1972 people used typewriters for this sort of thing (especially in the military), and typewriters used mono-spaced fonts.
The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction high-end word processing systems from Xerox and Wang, and later of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers. They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's.
Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang and other systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used mono-spaced fonts. I doubt the TANG had typesetting or high-end 1st generation word processing systems.
I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old. This should be pursued aggressively.
Now, look at one of these "new memos." And look at one of the old ones that has been used in previous stories. The Powerline reader is correct - the newly discovered memos are done in Times New Roman or a like font - and Texas Guard Units did not have laser printers in 1973!
The new docs are forgeries, and CBS News is passing them on uncritically.
P.S. to the hoaxsters - nice try, but if you write a "CYA" memo, you don't put CYA in the subject line.
UPDATE: You can see all those docs used to previously call the President's service into question here. All in typewriter font.
UPDATE II: Here's another document signed by Killian - typewriter font. As are all of the other documents from that unit that have been released.
posted by blaster at 09:49 AM | Comments (10)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
w
September 8, 2004 |
 |
 |
 |

My first substantive post
No, not this one, the first one, December 29, 2002.
World War III
Here's the lineup.
Good guys: US, Israel, Russia, and India.
Bad guys: Every majority Muslim nation in the world save Turkey.
I don't hold with the WWIII=The Cold War formulation, making the War on Terror (WOT) WWIV. This is truly the next World War, and we have really just gotten started.
I think Russia just figured it out.
posted by blaster at 01:10 PM | Comments (2)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
w
|
 |
 |
 |

Bomb squad stuff
Allah points to the Northeast Intelligence Network website in a post about rumors of what happened at LAX a couple of days ago. Basically, Allah's post says that there are rumors that there was really an IED, but that since NIN is hinting the same thing, it can't be true.
NIN posts a picture of a suitcase that is reportedly from LAX:

And then posts the following:
6 September 2004 -- HQ INTEL ALERT EXCLUSIVE: What happened to this piece of luggage on Saturday when it went through LAX??? Why did items of clothing show clear signs of charring?
Well, because bomb squad folks use explosive actuated remote tools to disarm IED's. None of that cut the red wire stuff, that's totally Hollywood. When they say don't leave your luggage unattended, it's because they haul it off and "blow it up." Not really, but it will end up looking like the above.
Evidently someone had reason to believe that there was an IED in the bag, or it was left unattended. And so they shot it with something like this:

So in answer to the NIN's question, what happened was the bomb squad remotely opened the bag, and the device they used caused charring of the clothes inside. That does not answer the question of whether an IED was actually in the bag, but anyone who saw the clothes to know they were charred would have seen evidence of an explosive device.
I think the lesson here, beyond Allah's point that NIN is the world's most alarmist website, is not to leave your luggage unattended.
posted by blaster at 08:58 PM | Comments (1)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|